Once Again on Misinterpretations of Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem

Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem states that no sufficiently strong consistent mathematical theory can prove its own consistency. In [1] this is proved for every axiomatic theory extending the Peano Arithmetic. For axiomatic set theory a simpler proof was given in [2] using the fact that in set theory, consistency of a set of axioms is equivalent to the existence of a model. In this note w...

متن کامل

Once again on the equivalence theorem

We present the proof of the equivalence theorem in quantum field theory which is based on a formulation of this problem in the field-anitfield formalism. As an example, we consider a model in which a different choices of natural finite counterterms is possible, leading to physically non-equivalent quantum theories while the equivalent theorem remains valid.

متن کامل

On the Nature of Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem

In several recent articles, we have shown how such totality conditions are related to both generalizations and boundary-case exceptions for the Second Incompleteness Theorem. For instance, our article [2] showed how essentially all axiom systems recognizing addition and multiplication as “total” functions are unable to prove a theorem affirming their semantic tableaux consistency. In contrast, ...

متن کامل

Kolmogorov complexity and the second incompleteness theorem

We shall prove the second incompleteness theorem via Kolmogorov complexity.

متن کامل

Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem Explained in Words of One Syllable

First of all, when I say "proved", what I will mean is "proved with the aid of the whole of math". Now then: two plus two is four, as you well know. And, of course, it can be proved that two plus two is four (proved, that is, with the aid of the whole of math, as I said, though in the case of two plus two, of course we do not need the whole of math to prove that it is four). And, as may not be ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Siberian Journal of Philosophy

سال: 2021

ISSN: 2541-7517

DOI: 10.25205/2541-7517-2020-18-3-132-143